0 Comments
1 category
The lawyer-petitioner argued the book lacked a statutory health warning on smoking, violating the 2013 Tobacco Act, but the book was later found to carry a disclaimer about smoking’s ill effects on the back
Category: Business & Economy
Related Posts
‘It doesn’t matter who we are playing, we want to be able to play at our own intensity’
Skipper Gill brushes aside question marks over Sai Sudharsan and…
SIT probe into anti-Maiost operations undermines federal structure of policing powers: Chhattisgarh High Court
A two-judge Bench of Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha and Judge…
Ahead of Muttaqi’s visit, India takes a step closer to recognising Taliban
India, China, Pakistan attend 10-nation Moscow Format talks that inducts…